Openfederal fundingFederal coverageTier 2 intelligence

A grant from DOD-AMC

Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant

TBAM-CRP is an Army collaborative research program for developing and experimentally evaluating coordinated and individual behaviors for small groups of autonomous agents in military-relevant maneuver environments. The supplied notice supports fit for research on multi-agent autonomy, resilient planning and coordination under uncertainty or disruption, and sophisticated simulation-based demonstration. It also supports a two-year pilot-and-option model, annual review, potential capstone demonstration, and encouraged collaboration with ARL and other recipients. However, the packet does not provide the Cycle 2 problem statement, full evaluation factors, current deadline, or detailed terms for Government-furnished software and tools; applicants should obtain the amended Cycle 2 FOA and Q&A before deciding scope or submitting.

Start here · Eligibility

Check whether your organization qualifies

Answer 5 focused questions in about 60 seconds before investing time in the application.

Take Eligibility Quiz
1 source-confirmed criterion · No signupReview criteria

Potential award

$100,000–$2,300,000

Time remaining

Rolling or unknown

Application load

Moderate effort

Best next move

Take the eligibility quiz

Apply

Verified against the source on 8/23/2026

01

Start here

Confirm eligibility

Check your fit in about 60 seconds.

Eligibility requirementsQuestion 1 of 5
About 60 seconds totalInferred criterion

Does your proposed work directly align with Science and Technology and other Research and Development, Education, Community Development, Environment, Equipment, Research?

What does this mean?

Science and Technology and other Research and Development, Education, Community Development, Environment, Equipment, Research

Review supporting source ↗
Does your proposed work directly align with Science and Technology and other Research and Development, Education, Community Development, Environment, Equipment, Research?
Select an answer to continue

No signup · Answers stay in this browser session

This is an explainable self-assessment, not a win probability or legal determination. Hard eligibility conflicts are never averaged against softer program-fit signals. Always verify the official notice.

Optional Review source criteria and citations

Nonprofit status

Confirm nonprofit eligibility in the full notice.

Review source ↗
unclear

Geography

Nationwide availability is inferred from the catalog record; confirm the official notice.

Review source ↗
inferred

Organization size

No organization-size limit was captured.

Review source ↗
unclear

Program area

Science and Technology and other Research and Development, Education, Community Development, Environment, Equipment, Research

Review source ↗
inferred

Population served

No specific population was captured.

Review source ↗
unclear

Matching funds

No cost share is indicated.

Review source ↗
confirmed

Registrations

SAM.gov and Grants.gov registration may be required; confirm in the notice.

Review source ↗
inferred

Exclusions

Review the full notice for exclusions and prohibited uses.

Review source ↗
unclear
02

Grant-writer assessment

Understand the opportunity

Start with the practical interpretation. Open the complete source narrative when you need the underlying detail.

Plain-English explanation

Plain-English explanation

TBAM-CRP is an Army collaborative research program for developing and experimentally evaluating coordinated and individual behaviors for small groups of autonomous agents in military-relevant maneuver environments. The supplied notice supports fit for research on multi-agent autonomy, resilient planning and coordination under uncertainty or disruption, and sophisticated simulation-based demonstration. It also supports a two-year pilot-and-option model, annual review, potential capstone demonstration, and encouraged collaboration with ARL and other recipients. However, the packet does not provide the Cycle 2 problem statement, full evaluation factors, current deadline, or detailed terms for Government-furnished software and tools; applicants should obtain the amended Cycle 2 FOA and Q&A before deciding scope or submitting.

Editorial analysis

What the funder is trying to accomplish

ARL seeks fundamental understanding and research that improves the mission capabilities of teams of robotics and autonomous systems; develops robust and resilient planning under extreme uncertainty; enables groups of agents to learn coordinated strategies toward common objectives; and informs future Army maneuver concepts in complex environments that include adversaries.

Editorial analysis

Strong-fit project signals

The proposed work directly concerns coordinated or individual behaviors for small groups of autonomous agents maneuvering in complex, military-relevant environments. The research addresses autonomy that remains effective amid communication or positioning-service disruption, failures, unexpected scenarios, uncertainty, or adversarial conditions. The project can demonstrate research outcomes in sophisticated simulations of relevant environments, which the program identifies as the minimum demonstration expectation. The applicant can contribute to collaboration with ARL researchers and other recipients. On-site collaboration at ARL and collaboration with other recipients are encouraged, rather than stated as mandatory. The work can be structured as a first-year pilot with measurable progress for an annual review and a credible basis for a possible second-year option and capstone activity.

Editorial analysis

What reviewers may prioritize

The notice confirms that compliant proposals receive merit-based competitive evaluation by qualified Government scientists and managers, using evaluation factors and an adjectival/color rating system. It does not supply the actual factors, definitions, or weights. Likely practical priorities include alignment to the cycle-specific problem, technical merit, credible simulation-based experimental evaluation, relevance to resilience and coordinated maneuver, and feasibility within the pilot/option model; these are inferences rather than confirmed review criteria.

Source dossier Read the full official program description
Source-backed synopsis

What this grant funds

**UPDATE 5 APRIL 2024: The proposal submission date has been updated to 24 April 2024. The FOA has been amended to reflect this submission date and include a Question and Answer document based on questions received from interested applicants. Other than the updated proposal submission date in the FOA, the actual FOA Amendment has not been changed. However, the answers provided in the Q&A document are considered part of the FOA Amendment.**

**CYCLE 2 UPDATE 20 MARCH 2024 - THE OPPORTUNITY WEBINAR FOR CYCLE 2 WILL BE HELD ONLINE VIA MS TEAMS AT 1500 EDT ON 22 MARCH 2024 AT THE FOLLOWING LINK:

https://dod.teams.microsoft.us/l/meetup-join/19%3adod%3ameeting_5fa41fe6fa874484b473d8a6ba7921c6%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22fae6d70f-954b-4811-92b6-0530d6f84c43%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22e9f6fc39-8f22-44e5-8bd0-64f0cde32305%22%2c%22IsBroadcastMeeting%22%3atrue%7d

**UPDATE 14 MARCH 2024 - CYCLE 2 HAS BEEN POSTED TO THE ANNOUNCEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THE UPDATED ANNOUNCEMENT IN FULL FOR SUBMISSION TIME, UPDATED TOPIC, AND FUNDING AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE CHANGES FROM CYCLE 1**

TACTICAL BEHAVIORS FOR AUTONOMOUS MANEUVER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM (TBAM-CRP)

Future Army forces will be called upon to operate and maneuver in multi-domain

operations (MDO), against a modern and capable peer adversary. The battlefield of the future

may impose additional constraints on maneuver forces such as disruption in communication as

well as positioning services. To field a highly capable fighting force in this future battlefield,

novel tactics and doctrines leveraging nascent technologies in robotics and autonomous systems

(RAS) will need to be developed. Teams of RAS will serve an increasingly critical role in the

future force to deliver situational awareness, defend key locations or positions, or take point in

dynamic and hazardous situations. Resilience to disruptions, failures, or unexpected scenarios, is

a key quality for teams of RAS to operate alongside other future Army forces. The US Army

Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is

focused on developing fundamental understanding and informing the art-of-the-possible for

warfighter concepts through research to greatly improve the scope of mission capabilities of

teams of RAS, develop robust and resilient approaches to plan under extreme conditions of

uncertainty, to learn coordinated strategies for groups of agents to achieve a common objective,

all within a complex maneuver environment including adversaries. The Tactical Behaviors for

Autonomous Maneuver Collaborative Research Program (TBAM-CRP) is focused on developing

and experimentally evaluating coordinated and individual behaviors for small groups of

autonomous agents to learn doctrinal as well as novel tactics for maneuvering in military relevant

environments. The TBAM-CRP will leverage developments in other internal and extramural

programs as well as identify new research directions to find novel solutions to these maneuver

problems in analogical simulations representing complex realistic terrain.

The Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Collaborative Research Program (TBAM-CRP) will

consist of a series of sprint efforts executed with annual program reviews. Each topic will be focused on

addressing a different set of scientific areas which will support the research aims of an associated ARL

researcher from a related internal essential research program (ERP) or mission-funded program.

The TBAM-CRP has been developed in coordination with other related ARL-funded collaborative efforts

(see descriptions of ARL collaborative alliances at https://www.arl.army.mil/business/collaborativealliances/)

and shares a common vision of highly collaborative academia-industry-government

partnerships; however, it will be executed with a program model adapted from the Scalable, Adaptive,

and Resilient Autonomy (SARA), which established a new paradigm for collaborative research. Some

key properties of this new approach are described below:

• TBAM-CRP sprint topics will be offered on a two-year cycle. Proposals will be solicited for a

possible two-year period structured as a first-year pilot followed by a second-year option where

the option may be awarded based upon progress assessed at an annual review. The FOA will be

amended annually to identify a specific problem statement and scope for that specific cycle. The

topics for each cycle will be chosen to address the long-term program goal.

• Five new topics (Cycles 1-5) are expected in FY22, 24, 26, 28, 30. Each topic will be carefully

chosen based on the previous accomplishments in the prior cycle(s), the development of new

technologies and capabilities in the broader research and development communities, and the

Army’s evolving needs for future capabilities.

• For each topic, funding will be provided to those Recipients selected under a cooperative

agreement (CA).

• Enhanced Research Program funding from ARL or Other Government Agencies (OGAs) may

become available during a cycle which provides a mechanism for growth and enhancement within

the TBAM-CRP. A proposal should not include any discussion of the Enhanced Research

Program. Recipients receiving a CA will be notified and provided details if the opportunity for

Enhanced Research Program funding becomes available during their award period of

performance.

• There is no limitation on the place of performance, although on-site collaboration at ARL

facilities and with ARL researchers as well as with other Recipients are encouraged. Research

outcomes in this program must, at the very least, be demonstrated in sophisticated simulations of

relevant environments. Together with ARL collaborators, these results may be adapted for higher

TRL experimentation on surrogate platforms at ARL test facilities such as the Robotics Research

Collaboration Campus (R2C2) at Graces Quarters, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

• Recipients will be furnished with access to the ARL Autonomy Stack software suite as well as all

relevant simulation tools and multi-agent learning support.

• Recipients will be provided with information about the current state of the Autonomous Systems

Enterprise (ASE) with an overview of developments in the associated collaborative research

alliances including Distributed and Collaborative Intelligent Systems and Technology (DCIST),

Scalable, Adaptive, and Resilient Autonomy (SARA), as well as internal ARL essential research

programs including the AI for Maneuver and Mobility (AIMM), Emerging Overmatch

Technologies (EOT), and Versatile Tactical Power and Propulsion (VICTOR). Capabilities

demonstrated in simulation should reflect significant appropriate developments. This midpoint

review is expected to take place as a mini symposium where Recipients can share results with

one another along with the ARL community to foster further collaboration.

• At the end of the second year, a capstone demonstration will be executed by those Recipients

receiving an option to their award in a set of simulated relevant environments, either those

environment scenarios provided by the Government and other program performers, or optionally

of a specific environment developed by the Recipient to exhibit their developed capability. Any

system level capability demonstration that can be made with the internal ARL collaborator or

description of capability development and program contribution can also be made at this time.

These system demonstrations are expected to coincide to foster further integration and adoption

with related internal research programs as well as partner organizations from within the

DEVCOM, other Army and DoD service branches and agencies, in addition to other government

agencies.

Proposals that follow the requirements of the FOA will be evaluated in accordance with merit-based,

competitive procedures. These procedures will include evaluation factors and an adjectival and color

rating system. A review team, consisting of a qualified group of Government scientists and managers

will evaluate the compliant proposals and provide the results of that evaluation to the decision-maker for

the Government. Relevant internal research program materials approved for public release and contact

information will be provided to potential proposers during introductory presentations to help facilitate

identification of collaboration between proposers and individual ARL researchers or internal research

programs. Additional connections to ARL programs can be identified during the proposal review process.

Eligible applicants under this FOA include institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, and

for-profit organizations (i.e., large and small businesses) for scientific research in the knowledge domains

outlined throughout this Funding Opportunity. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers

(FFRDC) may propose as well, with effort as allowed by their sponsoring agency and in accordance with

their sponsoring agency policy.

Read the complete official description ↗
03

Decision economics

Size the opportunity

Use the source facts below to judge whether the likely return justifies the application effort.

Award range
$100,000–$2,300,000
Total program funding
Not specified
Expected awards
Not specified
Geography
National
Cost share
Not indicated
Assistance listing
Not specified

Mission alignment

Compare your program with Science and Technology and other Research and Development, Education, Community Development.

Geographic fit

National

04

Working plan

Build the application

The generated milestones are planning aids. Only the official notice establishes required dates.

Requirements captured

Other requirements
It is our goal for the program to include a diverse group of Applicants with varied long-term interests.Applicants may be institutions of higher education, for-profit, or non-profit organizations. FederallyFunded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC) may propose as well, with effort as allowed bytheir sponsoring agency and in accordance with their sponsoring agency policy. Proposals may consistof teams from any combination of organizations (e.g., prime and subawardees), but this is not arequirement for award and award will only be made to a single entity.
Submission system
Grants.gov
Attachments
TBAM FOA Cycle 2 Amendment Question and Answer Document, TBAM-CRP CYCLE 2 Funding Opportunity Announcement
Contact
Christopher D Justice Contract Specialist · usarmy.adelphi.devcom-arl.mbx.tbam-crp-questions@army.mil · 9195494287

Official deadline

Not specified

Moderate effort based on requirements currently captured.

A preparation schedule will appear when a confirmed future deadline is available.

05Past behaviorCompare historical awardsHistorical patterns provide context, but do not predict or guarantee future funding decisions.
No licensed historical awards are currently linked to this opportunity.
06Audit trailVerify the evidenceSee where the facts came from, when they were checked, and what has materially changed.

Source record

Source verified means the official record was successfully checked. It does not mean every eligibility or application field has been extracted.

Verification
verified
Source
grants gov
Last checked
8/23/2026, 8:50:57 AM
Content updated
8/12/2026, 3:40:26 AM
Review
Automated normalization; not yet expert-reviewed
Open official source ↗

Material changes

  1. Updated categories.

  2. Updated categories.

  3. Updated amount max, amount min, application details, categories, cost share required, description, eligibility, eligibility details, important dates, requirements, source citations.

  4. Updated tracking started.

Verify before applying. Official funder documents control. Derived analysis and preparation dates should not replace the notice.
Browse the directory

Explore related funding collections

This grant appears in these evidence-backed collections based on its geography, program focus, and supported uses.

Keep searchingSimilar and alternative grantsExplore verified opportunities related by program area, funder, or funding type.
Quick answersFrequently asked questionsGet concise answers about Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant.
Is Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant currently open?

Yes, based on the latest source record. The deadline is Not specified. Because funders can amend or extend notices, confirm the date and submission instructions on the official application page. The source was last checked 8/23/2026.

How much funding does Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant provide?

Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant lists $100,000–$2,300,000 per award. The expected number of awards has not been captured, so the award range alone should not be treated as an estimate of competitiveness.

Who can apply to Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant?

Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification) Applicants should still complete the eligibility quiz and verify every condition in the official notice; a general fit does not override exclusions or registration requirements.

Does Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant require matching funds?

No cost-share requirement is indicated in the captured source facts. Applicants should still verify the official budget instructions in case an amendment, program track, or specific cost category carries additional conditions.

What should I prepare before applying to Tactical Behaviors for Autonomous Maneuver Grant?

Moderate effort is expected. The captured requirements include other requirements, submission system, attachments, contact. Start by confirming eligibility and registrations, then work backward from Not specified using the preparation plan above.

Maevena

Grant intelligence for non-profits

Find current opportunities, understand the source evidence, and reach the authoritative next step with fewer surprises.

Trust the source

Maevena supports research and initial decisions. Always confirm final eligibility, deadlines, and application requirements with the official funder.

Report a correction
© 2026 Maevena. Evidence-backed grant intelligence for non-profits.